In April 16 of 2016, 34 year old Jovan Fresco was shot dead by armed security officers in Rockford Illinios. Ryan B. Mattingly was just convited of first degree murder. The criminal case against his partner the night of the shooting, Alijon Khalil, is still pending.
Local Fox News has presented the most detailed coverage of the case. The two armed security officers were contracted private security working at Auburn Manor Apartments. Their responsibilities as private security were limited to protecting everything inside of the property line of the apartment complex. The Auburn Manor Apartments are located in the west side of Rockford and is a well known ghetto area frequented by the kind of operators you would expect to find in a high-crime ghetto neihborhood. The area is known for it's chronically high violent crime rate.
Fox reports that the night Fresco was shot, he had entered the Auburn Manor Apartment complex driving a while Mercedes. He parked his vehicle apparently to visit a friend that lived in the complex. Since he was a stranger to the complex both security officers approached him and when they did, he fled on foot. At the time Mattingly and Khalil had recieved information about a shots-fired incident in the area, so they pursued Fresco on foot.
The Fox report states that the chase then went beyond the property line of Auburn Manor where Mattingly and Khalil caught up to Fresco, took him to ground and a struggle ensued. At some point in the struggle Mattingly testified that Fresco drew a firearm and pointed it at Mattingly so Mattingly engaged Fresco shooting him numerous times. Fresco was pronouced dead on the scene.
Court documents confirm that Fresco was armed with at least one firearm that night and it was found near his body, and here is where it gets muddy, prosecutors contend that since Mattingly was no longer on the Auburn Manor Apartment complex property, he had no legal right to engage and ultimately shoot Fresco.
The legal point here is that Armed Private Security officers are not law enforcement officers and while armed security officers may have the right to detain a suspect found in the commission of a crime, they have no powers of arrest unless those powers are appointed to them by the state or law enforcement.
However, if an armed security officer witnesses a crime and is in continuous hot persuit of the suspect, and there is a reasonable fear that the general public is at immediate risk of death or serious bodiliy harm, the issue of leaving the contracted jurisdiction is not an issue.
My concern with this case as it is presented by Fox news is that there is a reasonable claim of self-defense if Fresco pointed a gun at the security officers regardless of which property they were on. In America we have the right to protect ourselves from any imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. The issue is whether or not Mattingly had a legal right to pursue and detain Fresco. While Fresco may have well been the person responsible for the gunfire reported to the two security officers when Fresco drove up, they did not witness Fresco committing a crime so while they had a legal right to approach and talk to him, as contracted private security they did not have the right to chase and detain him.
At it's very worst that is a minor offense that may or may not result in a criminal proceeding, most likely it would end up as a civil suit. If Fresco did point a gun at them then Mattingly had a right to defend himself whether he was on the property he was contracted to protect or not. While Mattingly was convicted, I imagine there will be an appeals process as first degree murder required pre-mediation and it appears there is an arguement that while Mattingly did shoot Fresco, he did so in self-defense against an armed threat and shot in response to that threat, therefore, pre-meditation is abscent.
While he did not see Fresco commit a crime, he may have reasonably felt that Fresco was responsible for the reported gunfire and, therefore, may have felt Fresco had bad intentions and felt the responsiblity to prevent further harm to the general public. Clearly at this point Law Enforcement should have been called but when Fresco fled there was an immediacy to respond.
If this is elevated to a higher court it will be interesting to see how they rule and those of us that work in Private Armed Security roles should be aware of how this case is ultimately ruled.
I'm interested to know your thoughts.
You can read the Fox News report Here