On Sunday, February 11/24 at approximately 1700 hrs, Las Cruces Police Department Officer Jonah Hernandez was brutally murdered in the line of duty. He was working alone and had responded to a trespass call at a place of business in Las Cruces, New Mexico. Once Hernandez arrived on scene, he observed and approached a lone male subject on foot. The male subject then suddenly attacked Officer Hernandez with a kitchen butcher knife and was stabbed multiple times. He was survived by his loving wife and two sons. The oldest boy is ten years old and the youngest is two.
A male civilian witnessed the attack and after retrieving the pistol he had secured in his vehicle, he approached the suspect and ultimately neutralized the threat he had encountered. The civilian then used Officer Hernandez's police radio to call for emergency medical response.
Our deepest sympathies go out to the Hernandez family, his wife, and most certainly his two sons who will never again hear his voice, feel his reassuring touch, or navigate life with ...
Who we are, why we are here, and what you can expect from us. Welcome to the community.
WARNING: This video contains graphic violence.
"On Friday The Las Cruces Police Department released body worn camera footage of Officer Jonah Hernandez being attacked which led to his death
Hernandez was responding to a trespassing call at 355 South Valley Drive at the intersection with Amador Avenue, and was stabbed to death by 29-year-old Armando Silva.
It is about this moment that Silva notices another individual approaching him. On Thursday, LCPD identified 29-year-old Isaiah Astorga as the man who intervened in the attack killing Silva."
Debrief Commentary:
There is always something to learn when we debrief an incident. While we want to be cautious not to criticize, we do want to evaluate the actions of others so we can learn from their experiences.
When we are called to deal with someone, we really never know what that person is going through, what they are dealing with, how they are doing at that moment, whether they are armed, what their intentions are and so on. Even if we know ...
TSG Protection just completed an Executive Protection assignment protecting Riley Gaines, the keynote speaker at a recent event in Florida. Riley came to prominence when she raced Lia Thomas, a biological male that identifies as a woman in an NCAA national level swim meet. She was credited with the NCAA making a ruling prohibiting biological males from competing in women sporting events in the NCAA.
Riley has become a target of liberal extremists and her being booked for this event, resulted in threats being received.
This podcast is about how we prepared for the assignment and what we look for in an executive protection agent for high risk or high profile clients.
The two weeks leading up to Holy Week and the Easter Weekend there was a constant flow of security concerns. Russia experienced a mass shooting and Isis claimed responsibility. France, Sri Lanka, and many other countries talked about beefing up their security for Good Friday and Easter Sunday due to the volume of "red flag" activity being ten times higher than it was prior to the 911 attack on the World Trade Center.
The information and warnings were wide spread globally as well as across the USA so many working security teams as well as law enforcement agencies stepped up their defenses.
Outside of some fireworks being thrown into church in Las Vegas, Easter weekend played out like almost any other weekend. No major attacks, no jihad, just the remembrance of Jesus Christ being crucified on the cross then celebration of his being resurrected on Sunday.
So did we over-react?
And how will we approach the next rumors of threats?
I share my thoughts in this episode of the ProtecTraining ...
I wear a Security uniform and exposed weapon when I protect our church and school, and because of that I have some iteration of this conversation at least once a day.
Protected Person: Why are you here and what do you wear all that for?
Me: Hello. I help protect the school and church.
Protected Person: Did something happen that you have to wear all those gadgets?
Me: No Sir/Maam, I am here to prevent something from happening. I am here to protect you and your family, the kids that go to school here and the teachers, and anyone else that may need it.
And from there, the conversation can go in any number of directions but I always do my best to turn it into a positive and friendly experience while giving them some measure of peace.
Our world has changed and having armed agents serving is a necessary component to any house of worship or school in our country, and around the world.
In this episode of the ProtecTraining Podcast I discuss the issue and offer some suggestions on how to ...
I had the honor to be the primary agent protecting a great American man tonight at a fundraiser in Vero Beach, Florida.
This was my loadout. Not a lot of extras, just the important stuff if things hit the fan. This was the kind of event the most wealthy and successful citizens attend and local law enforcement had site security, I was only responsible for the keynote speaker.
If something were to go wrong and I needed to respond, it would most likely have been a very serious threat.
So, I carried a backup firearm, and a knife and given the circumstances I chose to run without body armor, however, I should have worn it even though there were no active threats on the principle. My job is to be a human shield if neccesary and I can’t absorb many rounds and still be an effective protector without body armor. It was hot, and I had significant distances to move if attacked so I opted to be more agile and not overheated. I chose to take a risk but it was an unnecessary one and a bad decision on my...
It's been a long time coming and many wondered if those responsible for slow rolling the law enforcement response to the Uvalde, TX school mass shooting two years ago would be brought to justice. It took a while, but ex-Uvalde School Police Chief Pete Arredondo and officer Adrian Gonzales were charged with Child Endangerment last week. News story below.
Monday morning quarterbacking done by armchair warriors who have never been there and have never done the work provides nothing of value beyond inflating the speaker with a false sense of value and importance.
Careful evaluation by those who have done the work and chose to make a study of it for the benefit of others, however, can add value if approached with the intent to learn rather than criticize.
With that in mind, we offer you Debrief, a new section in our ProtecTraining Locals channel this week where we evaluate events experienced by others to learn what works, what could be done differently, and why. The sole purpose is to learn how we can be more effective and safer in our chosen profession.
Look for the first video and debrief coming this week.
In April 16 of 2016, 34 year old Jovan Fresco was shot dead by armed security officers in Rockford Illinios. Ryan B. Mattingly was just convited of first degree murder. The criminal case against his partner the night of the shooting, Alijon Khalil, is still pending.
Local Fox News has presented the most detailed coverage of the case. The two armed security officers were contracted private security working at Auburn Manor Apartments. Their responsibilities as private security were limited to protecting everything inside of the property line of the apartment complex. The Auburn Manor Apartments are located in the west side of Rockford and is a well known ghetto area frequented by the kind of operators you would expect to find in a high-crime ghetto neihborhood. The area is known for it's chronically high violent crime rate.
Fox reports that the night Fresco was shot, he had entered the Auburn Manor Apartment complex driving a while Mercedes. He parked his vehicle apparently to visit a friend that lived in the complex. Since he was a stranger to the complex both security officers approached him and when they did, he fled on foot. At the time Mattingly and Khalil had recieved information about a shots-fired incident in the area, so they pursued Fresco on foot.
The Fox report states that the chase then went beyond the property line of Auburn Manor where Mattingly and Khalil caught up to Fresco, took him to ground and a struggle ensued. At some point in the struggle Mattingly testified that Fresco drew a firearm and pointed it at Mattingly so Mattingly engaged Fresco shooting him numerous times. Fresco was pronouced dead on the scene.
Court documents confirm that Fresco was armed with at least one firearm that night and it was found near his body, and here is where it gets muddy, prosecutors contend that since Mattingly was no longer on the Auburn Manor Apartment complex property, he had no legal right to engage and ultimately shoot Fresco.
The legal point here is that Armed Private Security officers are not law enforcement officers and while armed security officers may have the right to detain a suspect found in the commission of a crime, they have no powers of arrest unless those powers are appointed to them by the state or law enforcement.
However, if an armed security officer witnesses a crime and is in continuous hot persuit of the suspect, and there is a reasonable fear that the general public is at immediate risk of death or serious bodiliy harm, the issue of leaving the contracted jurisdiction is not an issue.
My concern with this case as it is presented by Fox news is that there is a reasonable claim of self-defense if Fresco pointed a gun at the security officers regardless of which property they were on. In America we have the right to protect ourselves from any imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. The issue is whether or not Mattingly had a legal right to pursue and detain Fresco. While Fresco may have well been the person responsible for the gunfire reported to the two security officers when Fresco drove up, they did not witness Fresco committing a crime so while they had a legal right to approach and talk to him, as contracted private security they did not have the right to chase and detain him.
At it's very worst that is a minor offense that may or may not result in a criminal proceeding, most likely it would end up as a civil suit. If Fresco did point a gun at them then Mattingly had a right to defend himself whether he was on the property he was contracted to protect or not. While Mattingly was convicted, I imagine there will be an appeals process as first degree murder required pre-mediation and it appears there is an arguement that while Mattingly did shoot Fresco, he did so in self-defense against an armed threat and shot in response to that threat, therefore, pre-meditation is abscent.
While he did not see Fresco commit a crime, he may have reasonably felt that Fresco was responsible for the reported gunfire and, therefore, may have felt Fresco had bad intentions and felt the responsiblity to prevent further harm to the general public. Clearly at this point Law Enforcement should have been called but when Fresco fled there was an immediacy to respond.
If this is elevated to a higher court it will be interesting to see how they rule and those of us that work in Private Armed Security roles should be aware of how this case is ultimately ruled.
I'm interested to know your thoughts.
You can read the Fox News report Here